To observe that Sir It Robertson would appear to be correct in the supposition that the non-insertion of receipts and payments under Ordinance 17 of 1860 in the Estimate of $61,718 was owing to the fact that the Estimates were passed in 1860 before the Ordinance of that year.
His Explanation respecting the fees received by the Protector of Emigrants for attesting Emigration Contracts is also correct.
The matter has caused a reference to be made by the Colony respecting the leave granted to Mr. Duddell without a Public Sale as there are in this department the means of satisfying the Enquiries of the Commissioners of Audit on the subject.
And with reference to the items of Expenditure in Excess of the Estimate
Page 360
Page 361
which Special
Ordmances have bem
passed
been
Lamto observe that
Sie It Rolmion would
appear to be correct in
the suffosition that the
in the Estimate of 61
non insertion of recepti apagments under Ordiname
17 71860
Was
owing
Had the Extimates
To the fact were passed
in 1860
before the Ordmance of
that gear.
His Explanation
respecting the fees
received
bay.
353A
In Homeett
for attecting Emigration
Contracts is also correct.
The thake of eweneth has caused a reference
h
make
8 the Colonyto respecting
the leave
Granted to Mr. Duddell
without a Joublic Sale
as there are
in this dept
of Satisfying
the
means
Enques
of the Commmpionces
of Audit on the subject.
And with reference
the items of Expenditure
в
in Excess of the Estimate
Page 360Page 361
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.